UNILATERAL EMPLOYER’S REFUSAL
OF A CONTRACT OF WORK AND LABOUR:
KEY PRACTICE ISSUES
The article discusses several topical case law issues regarding employer’s unilateral
refusal of a construction contract which are currently characteristic in Russia and
which were quite surprisingly found together in the same case of a commercial court.
The author comes to a conclusion that as a result of unilateral refusal an obligation
connecting parties of an agreement passes into a liquidation stage in which the
equivalence of counter performances agreed by the parties should remain. But the
contents of the parties’ obligations at this stage differ considerably depending on whose
initiative and what reason leads to termination of the agreement. Nevertheless even in
case the employer refuses without any motive he is not obliged to reimburse the expenses
of the contractor under Art. 729 of the Civil Code along with damages under Art. 717
of the Civil Code because it leads to double and unfair enrichment of the contractor.
Anyway among the other expenses of the contractor the cost of the equipment and
the materials purchased by the contractor should not be reimbursed to him if they are
not transferred to the employer or the latter does not derive any value from them in
any other way. Correct evaluation of the contractor’s costs to be reimbursed becomes
especially important in case the result of the works is transferred to the employer only
in part. The author thoroughly describes contractors’ expenses separating them into
direct and indirect costs and also offers recommendations for contractual and law
enforcement practice. The article pays particular attention to so called conversion
(transformation) of unilateral refusal in case of its invalidity due to the fact that the
declared grounds for the refusal are absent or do not comply with the contract.
Keywords: contract of work and labour; unilateral refusal; contractor’s expenses; loss
on termination of an agreement; conversion (transformation) of unilateral refusal.
Egorov A.V. Delo «OOO «Baltijskij lizing» protiv OOO «Sibizoterm» i OOO «Sibgrejt
» o solidarnom vzyskanii zadolzhennosti po dogovoru lizinga» (kommentarij
k postanovleniyu Prezidiuma ot 18.05.2010 g. № 1059/10) [The Case of OOO Baltiysky
Leasing v. LLC Sibizoterm and LLC Sibgreit on the Joint Recovery of Debts
under a L easing Agreement (Commentary to the Resolution of the Presidium of 18
May 2010 No. 1059/10)] (in Russian) // Pravovye pozitsii Prezidiuma Vysshego
Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii: izbrannye postanovleniya za 2010 god
s kommentariyami [Legal Positions of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration
Court of the Russian Federation: Elected Resolutions for 2010 with Comments] /
Ed. by A.A. Ivanov. Moscow, 2015.
Egorov A.V. Likvidatsionnaya stadiya obyazatel’stva [Liquidation Stage of the
Obligation] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian
Federation. 2011. No. 9.
Egorov A.V. Mnogoznachnost’ ponyatiya obyazatel’stva: prakticheskij aspekt [The
Ambiguity of the Concept of Obligation: A Practical Aspect] (in Russian) // Bulletin
of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2011. No. 4.
Egorov A.V. Obshchaya dolevaya sobstvennost’: mekhanizm zashchity prav sosobstvennikov
[Common Share Ownership: A Mechanism for Protecting the Rights of
Co-Owners] (in Russian) // Civil Law Review. 2012. No. 4.
Egorov A.V. Preobrazovanie (konversiya) sdelki: nasushchnaya potrebnost’ oborota
[Conversion of the Transaction: The Urgent Need for Turnover] (in Russian) //
Grazhdanskoe pravo: sovremennye problemy nauki, zakonodatel’stva, praktiki:
Sbornik statej k yubileyu doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora Evgeniya Alekseevicha
Sukhanova [Civil Law: Modern Problems of Science, Legislation, Practice:
Collection of Articles for the Anniversary of Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor Evgeny
Alekseevich Sukhanov]. Moscow, 2018.
Egorov A.V. Verkhovnyj Sud raz’yasnil ponyatie sdelki. Nastupila li yasnost’ [The
Supreme Court Has Explained the Concept of the Transaction. Is It Clear] (in Russian)
// Arbitration Practice for Lawyers. 2015. No. 12.
Gernhuber J. Das Schuldverhaeltnis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1989.
Karapetov A.G. Osnovnye tendentsii pravovogo regulirovaniya rastorzheniya
narushennogo dogovora v zarubezhnom i rossijskom grazhdanskom prave: Dis. ...
dokt. yurid. nauk [The Basic Tendencies of Legal Regulation of Termination of the
Broken Contract in Foreign and Russian Civil Law: A Thesis for a Doctor’s of Law
Degree] (in Russian). Moscow, 2011.
Karapetov A.G. Rastorzhenie narushennogo dogovora v rossijskom i zarubezhnom
prave [Termination of the Broken Contract in Russian and Foreign Law] (in
Russian). Moscow, 2007.
Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii. Chast’ vtoraya:
Uchebno-prakticheskij kommentarij [Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian
Federation. Part Two: Educational and Practical Commentary] (in Russian) /
Ed. by A.P. Sergeev. Moscow, 2010.
Lavrov V.V. Priroda prav dol’shchikov na ob’ekt dolevogo stroitel’stva [The Nature
of the Rights of Equity Holders on the Object of Shared Construction] (in Russian) //
Opyty tsivilisticheskogo issledovaniya: Sbornik statej [Experiments of Civil Research:
Collection of Articles] / Ed. by A.M. Shirvindt, N.B. Shcherbakov. Moscow, 2016.
Palandt Kommentar zum Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. 72. Aufl. München:
C.H. Beck, 2013.
Papchenkova E.A. Vozvrat ispolnennogo po rastorgnutomu narushennomu dogovoru:
sravnitel’nyj analiz rossijskogo i nemetskogo prava [Return of the Executed
on the Broken Breached Contract: A Comparative Analysis of Russian and German
Law] (in Russian). Moscow, 2017.
Repin R.R. Kontragent otkazalsya ot dogovora. Kogda nachnyot tech’ srok davnosti
po vozvratu avansa [The Counterparty Has Refused the Contract. When Does the
Limitation Period Begin to Flow on the Return of the Advance] (in Russian) // Arbitration
Practice. 2017. No. 5.
Sarkisyan A.V., Novoselnov D.A. Ob otkaze ot prava i ego posledstviyakh [On the
Waiver of the Right and Its Consequences] (in Russian) // Herald of Economic Justice
of the Russian Federation. 2017. No. 4.
Shirvindt A.M. Ssylka na nichtozhnost’ sdelki kak zloupotreblenie pravom. Izobretenie
sudov, zakreplennoe v zakone [A Reference to the Nullity of a Transaction
as an Abuse of the Right. The Invention of Courts, Enshrined in the Law] (in Russian)
// Arbitration Practice. 2015. No. 7.
Staudinger Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch – Neubearbeitung 2009.
Berlin: Sellier – de Gruyter, 2009.
Tololaeva N.V. Priznanie sdelki nedejstvitel’noj i otvetstvennost’ po dogovoru:
raz’yasneniya VS RF [Rescission of the Transaction and Liability under the Agreement:
Clarification of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) //
Gift to the Subscribers of the Magazines «Lawyer of the Company» and «Arbitration
Practice for Lawyers». Moscow, 2017.
Usacheva K.A. Ob’yom obespechivaemogo obyazatel’stva: okhvatyvaet li obespechenie
takzhe i likvidatsionnuyu stadiyu obyazatel’stva? [The Scope of the Secured
Obligation: Does the Obligation Also Cover the Liquidation Stage?] (in Russian) //
Ob obespechenii obyazatel’stv: Sbornik statej k yubileyu S.V. Sarbasha [On Ensuring
Obligations: A Collection of Articles for the Anniversary of S.V. Sarbash] / Comp.
and ed. by A.V. Egorov. Moscow, 2017.
Usacheva K.A. Raschyot kompensatsii v sluchae nevozmozhnosti vozvrata
poluchennogo v nature pri rastorzhenii narushennogo dogovora [Calculation of
Compensation in Case of Impossibility to Return Received in Kind upon Termination
of the Broken Contract] (in Russian) // Law. 2017. No. 6.
Usacheva K.A. Vliyanie fakta narusheniya dogovora na opredelenie posledstvij
ego rastorzheniya [Influence of the Fact of Violation of the Contract on Determining
the Consequences of Its Termination] (in Russian) // Herald of Economic Justice
of the Russian Federation. 2017. No. 6.
Information about the author
Egorov A.V. (Moscow) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, First Deputy Chairman
of the Board of the Alexeev Private Law Research Centre under the President of the
Russian Federation, Professor, Director of the Russian School of Private Law (103132,
Moscow, Ilyinka St., 8, Bldg. 2; e-mail: email@example.com).