THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLAIM RIGHTS
AND CORRELATIVITY MAXIM IN PRIVATE LAW

S.V. TRETYAKOV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law
of the Faculty of Law of the Lomonosov Moscow State University, Professor of the Department
of Private International Law of the Russian School of Private Law

DOI: 10.24031/1992-2043-2018-19-1-7-27

The paper is an attempt in conceptual analysis of the concept of the claim right. To what
extent, if at all, a strictly Hohfeldian correlative conception of the pair claim right/
duty is appropriate? Can one meaningfully call such a strictly Hohfeldian claim right
a stricto sensu subjective right? These are the principle problems we are dealing with.


Keywords: claim rights; subjective right; legal duty; privilege (liberty right).

References

Achterberg N. Die Rechtsordnung als Rechtsverhältnisordnung: Grundlegung
der Rechtsverhältnistheorie. Duncker & Humblot, 1978.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchie dozvoleniya i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave [General
Permissions and General Prohibitions in Soviet Law] (in Russian). Moscow, 1989.
Bierling E.R. Juristische Prinzipienlehre. Bd. I. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1894.
Bucher E. Das subjektive Recht als Normsetzungsbefugnis. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck),
1965.
Em V.S. Kategoriya obyazannosti v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave (voprosy
teorii): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Category Duties in Soviet Civil Law (Theory): Thesis
for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences] (in Russian). Moscow, 1981.
Gordley J. The Jurists: A Critical History. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Hart H.L.A. Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy. Oxford
University Press, 1982.
Hellwig K. Anspruch und Klagerecht: Beiträge zum bürgerlichen und zum Prozessrecht.
G. Fischer, 1900.
Hohfeld W.N. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
// Yale Law Journal. 1917. Vol. 26(8).
Jhering R. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung.
Teil 3. Bd. I. Breitkopf und Härtel, 1865.
Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre. Mohr Siebeck, 1934.
Khvostov V.M. Sistema rimskogo prava [Roman Law System] (in Russian). Moscow,
1996.
Portmann W. Wesen und System der subjekiven Privatrechte. Schulthess, 1996.
Puchta G.F. Vorlesungen über das heutige römische Recht. Bd. II. Tauchnitz, 1855.
Savigny F.C. System des heutigen römischen Rechts. Bd. I. Veit, 1840.
Schulev-Steindl E. Subjektive Rechte: Eine rechtstheoretische und dogmatische
Analyse am Beispiel des Verwaltungsrechts. Springer, 2008.
Schultz T. Transnational Legality. Oxford University Press, 2014.
Sorokin V.D. Metod pravovogo regulirovaniya. Teoreticheskie problemy [Method
of Legal Regulation. Theoretical Problems] (in Russian). Moscow, 1976.
Thon A. Rechtsnorm und subjektives Recht. Scientia, 1878.
Tretyakov S.V. O probleme dogmaticheskoj kvalifikatsii pravomochiya rasporyazheniya
[On the Problem of Dogmatic Qualification of the Powers of Disposition]
(in Russian) // Osnovnye problemy chastnogo prava: Sbornik statej k yubileyu
A.L. Makovskogo [The Main Problems of Private Law: Collection of Articles for the
Anniversary of A.L. Makovsky]. Moscow, 2010.
Windscheid B. Die Actio des römischen Civilrechts, vom Standpunkte des heutigen
Rechts. Buddeus, 1856.


Information about the author

Tretyakov S.V. (Moscow) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of
the Department of Civil Law of the Faculty of Law of the Lomonosov Moscow State
University, Professor of the Department of Private International Law of the Russian
School of Private Law (119991, GSP-1, Moscow, Leninskie Gory, 1, Bldg. 13-14
(4th education building); e-mail: openstructure@gmail.com).

Наши партнеры

Our partners

unnamed.png
Юстина.png
логотип РС серый фон.png

Copyright © 2006-2019 

Вестник гражданского права. Все права защищены. 
«ИД В. Ема»: 119454, Москва, ул. Лобачевского, 92, корп. 2

Civil law review. All rights reserved.

«ID V.Ema»: 119454, Moscow, ul. Lobachevsky, 92, building. 2