СОДЕРЖАНИЕ КАТЕГОРИИ ВИНЫ
В ГРАЖДАНСКОМ ПРАВЕ:
В ПОИСКАХ ОПТИМАЛЬНОГО РЕШЕНИЯ*

​

https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2023-23-1-7-70

​

В статье рассматривается вопрос о том, должно ли содержание вины в гражданском праве во всех случаях быть структурировано одинаковым образом или же с теоретической и практической точки зрения предпочтителен подход, при котором вина от случая к случаю может иметь разное содержание. По результатам анализа различных концепций вины обосновывается, что гражданско-правовая вина должна включать в свое содержание поведение лица (поведенческую составляющую) и его психическое отношение (психическую составляющую), которые не соответствуют стандарту осмотрительного лица, также состоящему из двух взаимосвязанных элементов: поведенческого и психического. Продемонстрировано, что аналитическое обособление пове- денческой составляющей вины при определенных условиях позволяет сохра- нить те практические преимущества, которыми обладает исключительно поведенческая неосторожность.

​

Ключевые слова: вина; умысел; неосторожность; стандарт осмотрительного лица; противоправность.

​

References

​

Agarkov M.M. Guilt of the victim in Obligations from Causing Harm (Review of the Practice of the Supreme Court of the USSR). Soviet State and Law. 1940. No. 3. (in Russ.)

                    

Agarkov M.M. Obligation Under Soviet Civil law. in Agarkov M.M. Selected works on Civil law. in 2 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: Statut, 2012. (in Russ.)

                    

Agarkov M.M. Obligations from infliction of Harm (The Current law and the Tasks of the Civil Code of the USSR). in Agarkov M.M. Selected works on Civil law. in 2 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: Statut, 2012. (in Russ.)

                    

Agarkov M.M., Genkin D.M. (eds.). Civil law: Textbook. vol. 1. Moscow: legal Publishing House of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1944. (in Russ.)

                    

Alekseev S.S. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. (in Russ.)

                    

Antimonov B.S. The value of the Guilt of the victim in a Civil Offense. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1950. (in Russ.)

                    

Asknazii S.I. Guilt and infliction in Obligations to Compensate for Harm. Bulletin of Soviet Justice. 1925. No. 20. (in Russ.)

                    

Basin Iu.G. Guilt as a Condition of liability for Breach of Obligation. in Greshnikov I.P. (comp.). Selected works on Civil law. St. Petersburg: legal Center Press, 2003. (in Russ.)

                

Beever A. Corrective Justice and Personal Responsibility in Tort law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2008. vol. 28.

                    

Beliakova A.M. Civil liability for Causing Harm. Theory and Practice. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House, 1986. (in Russ.)

                    

Beliakova A.M. Property liability for Damage. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1979. (in Russ.)

                    

Binding K. Die Normen und ihre Übertretung: Eine Untersuchung über die rechtmäßige Handlung und die arten des Delikts. leipzig: Engelmann, 1872.

                    

Braginskii M.I., Vitrianskii V.V. Contract law. Book One: General Provisions. 3rd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2011. (in Russ.)

                    

Bratus S.N. legal Responsibility and legitimacy. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1976. (in Russ.)

                    

Bratus S.N. Subjects of Civil law. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1950. (in Russ.)

                    

Brüggemeier G. Haftungsrecht: Struktur, Prinzipien, Schutzbereich (Enzyklopädie der Rechtsund Staatswissenschaft abteilung Rechtswissenschaft). Berlin: Springer, 2006.

                    

Bussani M., Palmer V.V. (eds.). Pure Economic loss in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

                    

Cane P. Mens Rea in Tort law. in Naffine N., Owens P., Williams J. (eds.). intention in law and Philosophy. london; New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2001.

                    

Cane P. Responsibility in law and Morality. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2002.

                    

Cane P. The anatomy of Tort law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997.

                    

Denisov Iu.A. General Theory of Offense and Responsibility. Sociological and legal aspects. leningrad: leningrad University Publishing House, 1983. (in Russ.)

                    

Deutsch E. Die Fahrlässigkeit im neuen Schuldrecht. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis. 2002. Bd. 202. H. 6.

                    

Deutsch E. Fahrlässigkeit und erforderliche Sorgfalt. 2. aufl. Köln; Berlin; Bonn; München: Carl Heymanns, 1995.

                    

Deutsch E. Haftungsrecht. Bd. 1: allgemeine lehren. Köln; Berlin; Bonn; München: Carl Heymanns, 1976.

                    

Dorfman A. Reasonable Care: Equality as Objectivity. Law and Philosophy. 2012. vol. 31.

                    

Esser J., Schmidt E. Schuldrecht. allgemeiner Teil. Tb. 2. 7. aufl. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1992.

                    

Evstigneev E.A. Scientific and Practical Commentary to articles 1099–1101 Civil Code for Compensation for Moral Damage. Civil Law. 2022. No. 5. (in Russ.)

                    

Evstigneev E.A. The Principle of General Tort: The Current State and Prospects for application. Civil Law Review. 2017. Nos. 4, 5. (in Russ.)

                    

Fleishits E.A. Obligations from Causing Harm and Unjust Enrichment. in Fleishits E.A. Selected works on Civil law. in 2 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: Statut, 2015. (in Russ.)

                

Fleming J.J. Qualities of the Reasonable Man in Negligence Cases. Missouri Law Review. 1951. vol. 16.

                    

Frank R. Über den aufbau des Schuldbegriffs. Giessen: alfred Töpelmann, 1907. Geilen G. Strafrechtliches verschulden im Zivilrecht? JuristenZeitung. 1964. Bd. 19. Golubtsova Iu.A. legal Construction of Guilt in Russian Civil law: Thesis for

a Candidate Degree in law Sciences. Perm, 2015. (in Russ.)
Greenawalt K. law and Objectivity. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Gribanov V.P. limits of the Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House, 1972. (in Russ.)
Gribanov V.P. Responsibility for violation of Civil Rights and Obligations. in

Gribanov V.P. implementation and Protection of Civil Rights. Moscow: Statut, 2001. (in Russ.)

Gribkova Iu.Iu. Criteria for the Reasonableness of Measures Taken to Reduce losses. Civil Law Review. 2019. No. 3. (in Russ.)

                    

Gutnikov O.V. Corporate Responsibility in Civil law: Monograph. Moscow: institute of legislation and Comparative law; Kontrakt, 2019. (in Russ.)

                    

Hare R.M. The language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Heck P. Grundriss des Schuldrechts. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1929. Hetcher S. Non-Utilitarian Negligence Norms and the Reasonable Person Standard. Vanderbilt Law Review. 2001. vol. 54.
Holmes O.W. The Common law. Boston: little, Brown and Co., 1923.
Honoré T. Responsibility and luck: The Moral Basis of Strict liability. in Honoré T.

                    

Responsibility and Fault. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 1999.
Huber U. Handbuch des Schuldrechts. Bd. 9: leistungsstörungen i. Tübingen:

                    

Mohr Siebeck, 1999. Iablochkov M.T. The Burden of assertion (Onus Proferendi) in Civil Proceedings.

                    

Petrograd: Brothers’ v. & i. linnik Printing House, 1916. (in Russ.) Iablochkov T.M. The influence of the Guilt of the victim on the amount of Damages Compensated to Him. in 2 vols. vol. 1. Yaroslavl: Provincial Government’s Printing House, 1910. (in Russ.)
Iatsenko T.S. The Category of Chicane in Civil law: History and Modernity.

Moscow: Statut, 2003. (in Russ.) Imle W. vorsats, arglist und Hinterlist im BGB. Emsdetten: Heinr. & J. lechte, 1933. Ioffe O.S. Responsibility Under Soviet Civil law. leningrad: leningrad University Publishing House, 1955. (in Russ.) Ioffe O.S. The Meaning of Guilt in Soviet Civil law. in issues of State and law. leningrad, 1951. (in Russ.)
Ioffe O.S., Shargorodskii M.D. Questions of the Theory of law. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1961. (in Russ.)
Jansen N. Das Problem der Rechtswidrigkeit bei § 823 abs. 1 BGB. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis. 2002. Bd. 202. H. 4/5.

                    

Jansen N. Duties and Rights in Negligence: a Comparative and Historical Perspective on the European law of Extracontractual liability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2004. vol. 24.

                    

Jansen N. The Structure of Tort law: History, Theory, and Doctrine of Non-Contractual Claims for Compensation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

                    

Jörs P., Kunkel W. et al. Römisches Recht. Berlin et al.: Springer, 1987.

                    

Kantorovich Ia.A. Basic ideas of Civil law. Kharkov: legal Publishing House of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the Ukrainian SSR, 1928. (in Russ.)

                    

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Basic Provisions of Civil law: article-by-article Commentary on articles 1–16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 1.0]. Moscow: Statut, 2020. (in Russ.)

                    

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Change of Persons in Obligation and liability for violation of Obligation: Commentary on articles 330–333, 380–381, 382–406.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 2.0]. Moscow: M-logos, 2022. (in Russ.)

                    

Keating G.C. Reasonableness and Rationality in Negligence Theory. Stanford Law Review. 1996. vol. 48.

                    

Kelley P.J. who Decides – Community Safety Conventions at the Heart of Tort liability. Cleveland State Law Review. 1990. vol. 38.

                    

Kelzen G.; Antonov M.V., Lezov S.V. (trans.). Pure Doctrine of law. St. Petersburg: alef-Press, 2015. (in Russ.)

                    

Komarov A.S. Responsibility in Business. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1991. (in Russ.)

                    

Koziol H. Basic Questions of Tort law from a Germanic Perspective. wien: Jan Sramek, 2012.

                    

Koziol H. Traditional approach to Prevention in Tort law. Civil Law Review. 2014. No. 5. (in Russ.)

                    

Kramer E.A. Das Prinzip der objektiven Zurechnung im Deliktsund vertragsrecht. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis. 1971. Bd. 171. H. 5/6.

                    

Kramer M.H. Objectivity and the Rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

                    

Krivtsov A.S. General Doctrine of losses. iuriev: K. Mattisen’s Printing House, 1902. (in Russ.)

                    

Kunkel W. Diligentia. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1925. Bd. 45.

                    

Kuznetsova O.A. legal Guilt in the Conditions of Convergence of Private and Public law. in Valeev D.Kh., Ronchka K., Safin Z.F., Chelyshev M.Iu. (eds.). Scientific views of Professor G.F. Shershenevich in Modern Conditions of Convergence of Private and Public law (to the 150th anniversary of His Birth): Collection of Materials of international Scientific and Practical Conference (Kazan, 1–2 March 2013). Moscow: Statut, 2014. (in Russ.)

Kuznetsova O.A. The Category of Guilt in Civil Science and Codifications of the Civil legislation of the CiS Countries. in actual Problems of Civil law: Collection of Scientific works. Minsk: MiTSO, 2012. issue 1. (in Russ.)

                    

Larenz K. lehrbuch des Schuldrechts. Bd. 1: allgemeiner Teil. München: C.H. Beck, 1960.

                    

Lipinskii D.A.; Khachaturov R.L. (ed.). Problems of legal Responsibility. St. Petersburg: iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2003. (in Russ.)

                    

Lukianenko M.F. Estimated Concepts of Civil law: Reasonableness, Conscientiousness, Materiality. Moscow: Statut, 2010. (in Russ.)

                    

Magnus U. Multiple Tortfeasors under German law. in Rogers W.V.H. (ed.). Unification of Tort law: Multiple Tortfeasors. The Hague: Kluwer law international, 2004.

                    

Makashvili V.G. Criminal liability for Negligence. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1957. (in Russ.)

                    

Malein N.S.; Laptev V.V. (ed.). Property Responsibility in Economic Relations. Moscow: Nauka, 1968. (in Russ.)

                    

Mankovskii B.S. The Problem of Responsibility in Criminal law. M.: Publishing House of the academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1949. (in Russ.)

                    

Markelova A.A. The Ratio of Guilt and wrongfulness in the Delicts of the State. in Egorov A.V., Novitskaia A.A. (eds.). Treaties and Obligations. vol. 2: Special Part. Moscow: Private law Research Centre under the President of the Russian Federation named after S.S. alexeev Publ., 2018. (in Russ.)

                    

Matveev G.K.; Nikolaev K.P. (ed.). Guilt in Soviet Civil law. Kyiv: Kyiv University Publishing House, 1955. (in Russ.)

                    

Miller A.D., Perry R. The Reasonable Person. New York University Law Review. 2011. vol. 87.

                    

Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. 7. aufl. München: C.H. Beck, 2017.

                    

Murphy J., Witting C. Street on Torts. 13th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

                    

Novitskii I.B., Lunts L.A. The General Doctrine of Obligation. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1950. (in Russ.)

                    

Oigenzikht V.A. Property liability in Business Contracts. Dushanbe: Tajik State University named after v.i. lenin Publ., 1980. (in Russ.)

                    

Oliphant K. Basic Questions of Tort law from the Perspective of England and the Commonwealth. in Koziol H. (ed.). Basic Questions of Tort law from a Comparative Perspective. wien: Jan Sramek, 2015.

                    

Parisi F. liability for Negligence and Judicial Discretion. Berkeley: international and area Studies, University of California at Berkeley, 1992.

                    

Pokrovskii I.A. abstract and Concrete Man in the Face of Civil law. St. Petersburg: Partnership Printing House “Obshchestvennaia polza”, 1913. (in Russ.)

                    

Pokrovskii I.A. The Main Problems of Civil law. Moscow: Statut, 2001. (in Russ.)

                

Posner R.A. a Theory of Negligence. Journal of Legal Studies. 1972. vol. 1. Principles of European Tort law: Text and Commentary. wien: Springer, 2005. Puginskii B.I. Civil legal Means in Economic Relations. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1984. (in Russ.)
Rabinovich F.L. Guilt as the Basis of the Contractual liability of the Enterprise.

Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1975. (in Russ.)
Ripstein A. Equality, Responsibility, and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Safferling С.J.M. vorsatz und Schuld: Subjektive Täterelemente im deutschen und englischen Strafrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
Samoshchenko I.S. The Concept of an Offense Under Soviet law. Moscow: iuridicheskaia literatura, 1963. (in Russ.)
Schmoeckel M., Rückert J., Zimmermann R. (eds.). Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB. Bd. 2: Schuldrecht: allgemeiner Teil. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007. Schwartz Kh.I. The value of Guilt in Obligations from Causing Harm. Moscow: legal Publishing House of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1939. (in Russ.)
Seavey W.A. Negligence. Subjective or Objective? Harvard Law Review. 1927. vol. 41. Shargorodskii M.D. Guilt and Punishment in Soviet Criminal law. Moscow: legal Publishing House of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1945. (in Russ.) Shavell S. Economic analysis of accident law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian Civil law. Moscow: Brothers Bashmakovy’s Edition, 1911. (in Russ.)
Sinitsyn S.A. abuse of the Right: From General to Particular (on the Example of Patent Rights). Civil Law Review. 2022. No. 6. (in Russ.)
Smirnov V.T., Sobchak A.A. The General Doctrine of Tort Obligations in Soviet

Civil law. leningrad: leningrad University Publishing House, 1983. (in Russ.) Startseva Iu.V. The Principle of Guilt and Responsibility for Harm Caused by a Source of increased Danger. in Shirvindt A.M., Shcherbakov N.B. (eds.). Experiences of Civil Research: Collection of articles. issue 3. Moscow: Statut, 2019. (in Russ.) Stoll H. Handeln auf eigene Gefahr. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1961. Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. in 2 vols. vol. 1. Moscow: BEK, 1998. (in Russ.)
Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. in 2 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: Statut, 2011. (in Russ.)
Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. in 4 vols. vol. 1. Moscow: Statut, 2019. (in Russ.)
Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. in 4 vols. vol. 4. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2020. (in Russ.)
Tarkhov V.A. Responsibility Under Soviet Civil law. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House, 1973. (in Russ.)

Terré F., Simler P., Lequette Y., Chénedé F. Droit civil – les obligations. 12e éd. Paris: Dalloz, 2019.

Terry H.T. Negligence. Harvard Law Review. 1915. vol. 29.

Tololaeva N.V. Recognition of the Transaction as invalid and liability Under the Contract: Clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Moscow: aktion-Media, 2017. (in Russ.)

                    

Utevskii B.S. Guilt in Soviet Criminal law. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1950. (in Russ.) van Dam C. European Tort law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Varshavskii K.M. Obligations arising from Causing Harm to another. Moscow: legal Publishing House of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1929. (in Russ.)

                    

Viney G., Jourdain P. Traité de droit civil – les conditions de la responsabilité. 3e éd. Paris: lGDJ, 2006.

von Bar C. Gemeineuropäisches Deliktsrecht. Bd. 2: Schaden und Schadenersatz, Haftung für und ohne eigenes Fehlverhalten, Kausalität und verteidigungsgründe. München: C.H. Beck, 1999.

                    

Wahl E. Das verschuldensprinzip im künftigen Schadenersatzrecht. in Nipperdey H.C. (ed.). Grundfragen der Reform des Schadenersatzrechts: 1. arbeitsbericht des ausschusses für Personen-, vereinsund Schuldrecht der akademie für Deutsches Recht, Unterausschuss für Schadenersatzrecht. München: C.H. Beck, 1940.

                    

Weinrib E.J. The idea of Private law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

                    

Weinrib E.J. Toward a Moral Theory of Negligence law. in Bayles M.D., Chapman B. (eds.). Justice, Rights, and Tort law. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co., 1983. widmer P. (ed.). Unification of Tort law: Fault. The Hague: Kluwer law international, 2005.

                    

Wieacker F. Rechtswidrigkeit und Fahrlässigkeit im Bürgerlichen Recht. Juristenzeitung. 1957. 12. Jahrg. Nr. 17.

                    

Zimmermann R. The law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town: Juta & Co. ltd., 1990.

                    

Zipursky B.C. Sleight of Hand. William and Mary Law Review. 2007. vol. 48. Information about the author

                    

Ivanenko V.V. (Moscow, Russia) – leading Specialist, Department of General Provisions on Obligations, alexeev Private law Research Centre under the President of the Russian Federation, PhD Student, institute of legislation and Comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Master of Private law (Russian School of Private law) (8, Bldg. 2 ilyinka St., Moscow, 103132, Russia; e-mail: slava.ivanenko.97@mail.ru). 

​