PROHIBITION OF REFUND
OF KNOWINGLY UNNECESSARY PERFORMANCE: INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF PARAGRAPH 4 OF ARTICLE 1109 OF THE CIVIL CODE
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

​

https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2023-23-1-172-214

The controversial formulation of paragraph 4 of Article 1109 of the Civil Code was the reason for its incorrect application. This led to the idea of the need for a restrictive interpretation of this norm. This approach, which originated in jurisprudence, has now been largely overcome by it, but it remains predominant in legal doctrine. Meanwhile, judicial practice has not yet formed a unified understanding of paragraph 4 of Article 1109 of the Civil Code. The present research aims to study the relevance of rejecting a restrictive interpretation of paragraph 4 of Article 1109 of the Civil Code. The article examines the history, foreign analogues, the nature and practice of application of this norm. As a result of the work the conclusion is made about the necessity of an expansive interpretation of paragraph 4 of Article 1109 of the Civil Code as a particular manifestation of the principle of good faith and the prohibition of abuse of right.

​

Keywords: unjust enrichment; defence to a claim; no mistake in the victim’s actions; good faith; prohibition of abuse of right; estoppel.

References

​

Agarkov M.M. Obligation Under Soviet Civil law. in Agarkov M.M. Selected works on Civil law. in 2 vols. vol. 1. Moscow: Tsentr iurinfor, 2002. (in Russ.)                    

Braginskii M.I., Vitrianskii V.V. Contract law. Book One: General Provisions. 4th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2001. (in Russ.)

Civil Code: a Project of the Highest Established Editorial Commission for the Preparation of the Civil Code. Book v: Commitment. vol. v. with Explanations (arts. 937–1106). St. Petersburg, 1899. (in Russ.)

Dikhtiar A.I., Anisimova E.S. Obligations Related to Unjust Enrichment: issues of Theory and Practice (SPS “ConsultantPlus”. 2008). (in Russ.)

Em V.S. Obligations Due to Unjust Enrichment. Legislation. 1999. No. 7. (in Russ.) Erdelevskii A.M. On Unjust Enrichment. Law and Politics. 2001. No. 1. (in Russ.) Erdelevskii A.M. Unjust Enrichment That is Not Subject to Return (SPS “ConsultantPlus”. 2017). (in Russ.)
Gallo P. Unjust Enrichment: a Comparative analysis. American Journal of Comparative Law. 1992. vol. 40. 

Gerbutov V.S. imposed Enrichment. To the Doctrine of Enrichment according to Russian law. Civil Law Review. 2011. No. 2. (in Russ.)

Gerbutov V.S. Review of Dissertations on the Topic of Unjust Enrichment. Civil Law Review. 2008. No. 2. (in Russ.)

Godeme E.; Novitskii I.B. (trans.). General Theory of Obligations. Moscow: legal Publishing House of the Ministry of Justice of the USSR, 1948. (in Russ.)

Gurvich M.A. The institution of Unjust Enrichment in its Main Features Under the Civil Code of the RSFSR. Soviet Law. 1925. No. 2(14). (in Russ.)

Julliot de la Morandière L.; Fleischitz E.A. (trans.). Civil law of France. in 3 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: Publishing House of Foreign literature, 1960. (in Russ.)

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Basic Provisions of Civil law: article-by-article Commentary on articles 1–16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 1.0]. Moscow: M-logos, 2020. (in Russ.)

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Contract law (General Part): article-by-article Commentary on articles 420–453 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 2.0]. Moscow: M-logos, 2020. (in Russ.)

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Contractual and Obligation law (General Part): articleby-article Commentary on articles 307–453 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 1.0]. Moscow: M-logos, 2017. (in Russ.)

Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Transactions, Representation, limitation Period: articleby-article Commentary on articles 153–208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic Edition. Revision 1.0]. Moscow: M-logos, 2018. (in Russ.)

Kozyr O.M., Makovskii A.L., Khokhlov S.A. (eds.). Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part Two: Text, Comments, alphabetical index. Moscow: international Center for Financial and Economic Development, 1996. (in Russ.)

Lobacheva A.M. Restrictions on the amount Claimed Under the Conditional Claim. in Egorov A.V. (ed.). Contracts and Obligations: Collection of works of Graduates of the Russian School of Private law at the Research Center for Private law named after S.S. alekseev Under the President of the Russian Federation. vol. 3. Moscow: association of Graduates of the Russian School of Private law, 2019. (in Russ.)

Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd. 5: Schuldrecht, Besonderer Teil iii: § 705–853. 6. aufl. München: C.H. Beck, 2013.

Nam K.V. The Principle of Conscientiousness: Development, System, Problems of Theory and Practice. Moscow: Statut, 2019. (in Russ.)

Nevzgodina E.L., Filippova O.S. Non-Contractual Protective Obligations: Textbook. Omsk: Omsk State University Publishing House, 2018. (in Russ.)

Novak D.V. Evolution of Condiction in Roman Private law. in Shilokhvost O.Iu. (ed.). actual Problems of Civil law: Collection of articles. issue 8. Moscow: Norma, 2004. (in Russ.)

Novak D.V. Unjust Enrichment in Civil law. Moscow: Statut, 2010. (in Russ.)

Novak D.V., Gerbutov V.S. Key Problems of Obligations from Unjust Enrichment. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2014. No. 1. (in Russ.) 

Novitskii I.B., Pereterskii I.S. (eds.). Roman Private law: Textbook. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2012. (in Russ.)

Osipova L.V. Unjust Enrichment: law Enforcement in a New way? Bulletin of Arbitration Practice. 2017. No. 6. (in Russ.)

Palandt Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. 71. aufl. München: C.H. Beck, 2012.

Pobedonostsev K.P. Civil law Course. Part Three: Contracts and Obligations. Moscow: Statut, 2003. (in Russ.)

Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) / Ed. by Chr. von Bar, E.M. Clive. Munich: Sellier European law Publishers, 2009.

Riasentsev V.A. Obligations from the So-Called Unjust Enrichment in Soviet Civil law. in Scholars Notes of Moscow State University: Proceedings of the law Faculty. 1949. issue 144. Book 3. (in Russ.)

Salmin D.N. Restriction of the Conditional Obligation by the amount of Cash Enrichment. Civil Law Review. 2014. No. 3. (in Russ.)

Sergeev A.P. (ed.). Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part Two: Educational and Practical Commentary (article-by-article). Moscow: Prospekt, 2010. (in Russ.)

Sklovskii K.I. Property in Civil law: Textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: Delo, 2000. (in Russ.)

Sklovskii K.I. The Deal and its Effect. Commentary on Chapter 9 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The Principle of Good Faith. 4th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2019. (in Russ.)

Solomina N.G. Obligation from Unjust Enrichment: Concept, Types, Compensation Mechanism. Moscow: iustitsinform, 2009. (in Russ.)

Stepanov D.I. issues of Theory and Practice of issuance Securities. Economy and Law. 2002. No. 5. (in Russ.)

Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law: Textbook. in 4 vols. vol. 4. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2020. (in Russ.)

Terré F., Simler P., Lequette Y., Chénedé F. Droit civil – les obligations. 12e éd. Paris: Dalloz, 2019.

Tigranian A.R. Consequences of Concluding Transactions in violation of the Procurement legislation: an analysis of arbitration Practice. Lawyer. 2019. No. 11. (in Russ.)

Tuzov D.O. The idea of the inadmissibility of “Venire Contra Factum Proprium” in Connection with the Rule on the irrelevance of the Declaration of invalidity: legal Maxim or Principle? Law. 2020. No. 4. (in Russ.)

Tuzov D.O. The Theory of invalidity of Transactions: The Experience of Russian law in the Context of the European legal Tradition. Moscow: Statut, 2007. (in Russ.)

Ushivtseva D.A. Obligations Due to Unjust Enrichment: issues of Theory and Practice. Tiumen: Slovo, 2006. (in Russ.)

Virgo G. The Principles of the law of Restitution. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Zimmermann R. The law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town: Juta & Co. ltd., 1990.

Zweigert K., Ketz H. introduction to Comparative law in the Field of Private law. in 2 vols. vol. 2. Moscow: international Relations, 2000. (in Russ.)

Information about the author     

Khandkarov Iu.S. (Moscow, Russia) – legal assistant at Birch Legal, Master Student, institute of legislation and Comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation (34 B. Cheremushkinskaia St., Moscow, 117218, Russia; e-mail: yuriy6191@gmail.com).